In 12 years' time, the earliest examples of Mazda's MX-5 sportscar will be eligible for the Revival's Tax-Free Classics car park. The survivors will, perhaps astonishingly, be 40 years old. And the chances of there still being representatives on the road have just been boosted by Mazda's announcement, following a trial run to assess its feasibility, of a new scheme to restore customers' cars to as-new condition.
There are several significant things about this. It means the MX-5 is officially a classic worth restoring. It's officially a car of sufficient auto-cultural importance to merit a factory rebirth programme, just like Jaguar Reborn and Land Rover Reborn and the less obviously-branded efforts of Porsche Classic and Ferrari Classiche, to name just a few. And it means that genuine factory parts, of which there is still an encouragingly large number for early MX-5s, will not only continue to be available but will see their catalogue grow.
But before you get too excited, this is a programme offered – so far – only in Japan. Quite apart from the obvious fact that this is the MX-5's homeland, it's also where values of the little sportscar have been rising the most and so owners will get the best return on their restoration investment. In the UK, where MX-5s have gone rustier sooner (no salt on Japanese winter roads) and values have stayed lower, a thorough restoration and the greater work it's likely to entail, remains a heart-led decision rather than one involving any hint of financial rationality.
Nevertheless, I checked with Mazda UK to see if there is any likelihood of a similar scheme in Europe one day. So far there isn't, the possibility reduced further by the fact that, to have the right ring of authenticity, the European-domiciled cars would have to be sent expensively back to Japan. The same applies to the US, where the MX-5 was on sale first, although it's usefully nearer to Japan.
The new 'Roadster Restore' scheme is still a great idea, though. Roadster? That's what the Mark 1, or NA-model, MX-5 is called in Japan, the Eunos Roadster. It was launched in September 1989, a few months after the US's Mazda Miata version went on sale in July 1989. Europe didn't get its MX-5-badged cars until early 1990, so original UK-market cars actually have 13 years to wait for Revival acceptance.
The second of the two Mazdas I have owned would have qualified in 12 years' time, though, because it was – like, nowadays, the majority of NA MX-5s on UK roads – a Eunos Roadster.
It was an October 1989 example in what I think is the best colour, Mariner Blue, which happens to be exactly the same shade as a motorway sign. It was imported at 10 years of age, so rust-wise was about a decade behind where it would have been had it lived here from new, and was misregistered on UK import with an F-registration (it should have been a G), emphasising its earliness.
There was a rush of Eunoses (Eunoi?) during the Noughties, more than filling the gap left by the gradual rust-related demise of the UK-market cars, and some of them, like mine, have since been caught at the right time in their life-cycle to be properly rust-protected before the damage has gone too far.
A trickle of very tidy Eunoi still arrives from Japan but prices are shooting upwards to reflect what is happening back home. Meanwhile cosseted, low-mileage UK-market cars occasionally emerge and sell at remarkable prices, sometimes approaching five figures. The days of finding a sound, tidy example, be it MX-5 or Eunos, for around £1500, or indeed a useable knockabout runner for £500, are fading fast.
There is a notion among some MX-5-fanciers that a UK-market car is better and more proper, but I reckon a Eunos is somehow freer-spirited, more comfortably Japanese, more exotic. It also tends to be better equipped – mine had air-con and a limited-slip differential – and you get the chance, like I did, to have a car from the first year of production and thus the closest to how its creators intended it to be.
I loved my bright blue Eunos, now happily living with a journalist friend. It was much more fun than its predecessor in my garage, a later 1.8-litre, UK-market version in base spec. I bought that one in the mistaken belief that its lack of power steering would make it a yet more involving drive, but all it did was slow the reactions, spoil the sharpness and kill the wrist-flickability. The Eunos was faster too, despite being a 1.6, on account of its revvier, more blippable engine and the undoubted help of a free-flowing aftermarket exhaust system.
MX-5s in their various forms can still be a brilliantly low-cost route to open-air motoring, even allowing for the rising prices, and the engine's enthusiasm, the gearchange's snicketiness and the purity of the rear-drive handling make every drive a bit of an event. Why did I sell it? I don't really know. What I do know is that its buyer got a bargain, given what I'd spent to rescue it from its descent into mid-life chavviness and restore it back to near-standard with light enhancements. And the best time I ever had with it was during a dozen laps of our own Motor Circuit, 7000rpm frequently seen
Mazda's Roadster Restore is accepting cars from late this year, with a view to starting work in early 2018. Behind the project is Nobuhiro Yamamoto, the company's Roadster Ambassador, who sums it up thus: 'Everyone will be happy.' That said, there's no word yet on pricing…
John simister
mazda
mx-5